Private BetaWe're currently in closed beta.Join the waitlist
All posts
Case StudiesNovember 20, 2024

The Utilization Trap: Why 100% Billable Is Bad for Business

High utilization looks efficient. But it hides costs that don't show up on the P&L.

The trap: If 75% utilization is good, isn't 85% better? If 85% is possible, why not 95%? Here's why not.

Every consulting firm tracks utilization—the percentage of available hours being billed to clients. And every firm has felt the pressure to push it higher.

The math seems obvious. But it's incomplete.


The Visible Math

COST:     The same at 70% or 90% utilized
REVENUE:  29% more at 90% vs 70%

10-person team: 75% → 90% utilization = 2 additional consultants worth of revenue = Without hiring anyone

           ◀ This is what drives utilization pressure ▶

This math isn't wrong—as far as it goes.


The Hidden Costs

Burnout & turnover
Replacement cost: 50-100% of annual salary. One departure erases months of "extra" revenue.
Quality degradation
95% utilized consultants don't think, they execute. Deliverables get good enough, not great.
No growth capacity
When maxed out, you turn down work or staff with stretched people. Neither is good.
BD dies
Partners delivering instead of developing. Pipeline dries up. Revenue becomes lumpy.

The Right Utilization Targets

Role Target Why
Partner 40% BD, relationships, firm leadership
Principal 60% Mix of delivery and BD
Senior 75% Primarily delivery, some mentoring
Consultant 80% Delivery focused

These numbers give you slack. Slack for quality. Slack for growth. Slack for the unexpected.


Utilization as a Symptom

High utilization isn't always a choice. Sometimes it's a symptom:

Symptom What It Looks Like Real Solution
Understaffing Can't say no to work Hire
Pricing too low Need more hours for revenue Raise rates
Scope creep Projects expand unpaid Better scope management
Pipeline gaps Take everything that comes in Better BD

Pushing utilization higher masks these problems. It treats symptoms while the disease progresses.


Managing Utilization Intelligently

Visibility — Know where you are across the team, in real-time.

Balance — Identify over-allocated individuals early, before burnout.

Forecasting — See what's coming so you can plan, not react.

Trade-offs — Willingness to sacrifice utilization for quality/growth.

This is harder than just pushing a number higher. But it's how you build a firm that lasts.


Key Takeaway

The right target isn't maximum utilization—it's optimal utilization. The level that balances revenue generation against all the hidden costs. For most firms, that's 70-80% for delivery staff, lower for those with BD responsibilities.

Ready to see what your AI agents do?

Join the waitlist for early access.

Join Waitlist